$toxic fracking decade ago new files$

$toxic fracking decade ago new files$

'EPA has concerns that these degradation products will persist in the environment, could bioaccumulate or biomagnify, and could be toxic (PBT) to people, wild mammals, and birds based on data on analog chemicals, including PFOA and. The document went on to cite 'preliminary evidence' that the chemicals could degrade upon use and become persistent, bioaccumulative and toxic, or PBT. 'EPA is concerned that these perfluorinated degradation products may be released to the environment from incomplete incineration of the PMN substances at low temperatures,' the agency wrote in a heavily redacted consent order.

$toxic fracking decade ago new files$

They also highlighted potential problems with disposal of the chemicals.

$toxic fracking decade ago new files$

At the time, regulators worried that the chemicals used could break down into compounds similar to PFOA - a type of PFAS that is no longer manufactured in the United States due to concerns about its health implications, including causing cancer. The revelations further public awareness about the extent of PFAS use at a time when the chemicals are facing fire from lawmakers and regulators.Īccording to the documents released to the advocacy group under FOIA, EPA reviewed the three proposed chemicals in 2010. According to the Environmental Defense Fund, recent findings show they are also likely in common plastic packaging, bringing them into close contact with food. PFAS (which number in the thousands) are prized for their grease- and water-resistant properties, and are widely used in everything from household items to industrial firefighting foam. 'Considering the terrible history of pollution associated with PFAS, EPA and state governments need to move quickly to ensure that the public knows where these chemicals have been used and is protected from their impacts.' 'The evidence that people could be unknowingly exposed to these extremely toxic chemicals through oil and gas operations is disturbing,' report author Dusty Horwitt said in a statement. Those activities occurred in Arkansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Texas and Wyoming. are among companies that have used either PFAS or chemicals that can degrade into PFAS in fracking at more than 1,200 wells between 20, according to industry records. At one State of the State address in Albany, we numbered in the thousands.A report out today examines the Obama EPA’s approval of three PFAS chemicals for use in oil and gas production, despite concerns among agency staff and indicators that the agency may have relied on 'dubious assumptions.'Įxxon Mobil Corp. At Cuomo’s book launch event in Manhattan, anti-fracking protesters far outnumbered potential book-buyers. It reached a point where the governor expected us to show up by the dozens or hundreds at any of his public events, anywhere in the state. The grassroots pressure on Cuomo was relentless - and effective.

$toxic fracking decade ago new files$

But it still took serious work to get the governor to agree. New Yorkers should be thankful that our state was spared the array of obvious harms and hazards associated with fracking. And fracking creates an enormous amount of toxic, radioactive waste that must be dumped somewhere. A recent outbreak of rare, deadly cancers in heavily fracked areas of southwestern Pennsylvania has families demanding answers from state regulators and a governor who has championed the industry. Studies are still uncovering health problems linked to drilling, including low birth weights and increased asthma rates near well pads. A large and growing body of science shows that fracking is even more dangerous than we knew at the time. Drilling in Pennsylvania had contaminated drinking water and created serious air pollution problems.

$toxic fracking decade ago new files$

Toxic fracking decade ago new files